Satellite observation has disproved the dust disk theory.
When the scientists were looking into the space to
find an answer to the question as to how planets were formed, they stumbled
upon the massive rotation of dust and gases around many stars in the space.
On the basis of this finding, it was strongly believed that when the giant space clouds had shrunk, flattened and rotated, the massive core area could have become the Sun and the dust and gases moving around it might have clustered here and there in due course and led to the formation of other planets.
As per this theory, it was also believed that since the dust and gases close to the Sun would evaporate due to its heat, all the planets in question would have formed at a certain distance from the Sun. This theory is called as dust disk theory.
but recent discoveries disproved the dust disk theory.
for example, nitrogen gas is known to expelled from Pluto which is orbiting the sun at 40 AU (1 AU is 150 million km i.e. one earth sun distance)
but the earth atmosphere is consist of 78% of nitrogen, therefore the question raised hear how can the earth formed near the sun with such a huge amount of nitrogen?
Similarly, satellite observation has revealed that sodium is expelled from moon due to sun rays.in this situation, satellite observation has also revealed that sodium is expelled from the mercury which is the nearest planet to the sun. Theretofore the question here is, how can the planet mercury form with sodium?
Similarly water and carbon dioxide are known to expelled form comets when the comets approach the sun at mars distance.
Theretofore the question here is, how can the planet earth and moon form with water? Certainly not. Theretofore I concluded that the recent satellite observation has disproved the dust disk theory.
On the basis of this finding, it was strongly believed that when the giant space clouds had shrunk, flattened and rotated, the massive core area could have become the Sun and the dust and gases moving around it might have clustered here and there in due course and led to the formation of other planets.
As per this theory, it was also believed that since the dust and gases close to the Sun would evaporate due to its heat, all the planets in question would have formed at a certain distance from the Sun. This theory is called as dust disk theory.
but recent discoveries disproved the dust disk theory.
for example, nitrogen gas is known to expelled from Pluto which is orbiting the sun at 40 AU (1 AU is 150 million km i.e. one earth sun distance)
but the earth atmosphere is consist of 78% of nitrogen, therefore the question raised hear how can the earth formed near the sun with such a huge amount of nitrogen?
Similarly, satellite observation has revealed that sodium is expelled from moon due to sun rays.in this situation, satellite observation has also revealed that sodium is expelled from the mercury which is the nearest planet to the sun. Theretofore the question here is, how can the planet mercury form with sodium?
Similarly water and carbon dioxide are known to expelled form comets when the comets approach the sun at mars distance.
Theretofore the question here is, how can the planet earth and moon form with water? Certainly not. Theretofore I concluded that the recent satellite observation has disproved the dust disk theory.
Thanks,
Scientist G.Ponmudi
India.
Comments